The New International Law Scholarship

27 Pages Posted: 15 May 2006  

Eric A. Posner

University of Chicago - Law School

Jack Landman Goldsmith III

Harvard Law School

Abstract

This essay replies to criticisms advanced at a conference on our book, The Limits of International Law. We engage the critics on several methodological issues, we attempt to correct misimpressions about some of our arguments, and we reiterate our distinctive empirical claims. We also argue that our critics have more in common with us, and less in common with traditional international law scholars, than they are willing to admit. This observation leads us to claim that a new kind of international law scholarship is emerging, one that relies more heavily on social scientific attitudes and methodologies than the international law scholarship that it is gradually displacing. This trend fills us with optimism about the field, but at the same time we predict, with some misgiving, that much future scholarship will be preoccupied with reconciling the traditional liberal internationalism of the international law academy and the new imperative to use rigorous social scientific methods.

Suggested Citation

Posner, Eric A. and Goldsmith, Jack Landman, The New International Law Scholarship. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, Forthcoming; U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 126. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=901991

Eric A. Posner (Contact Author)

University of Chicago - Law School ( email )

1111 E. 60th St.
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
773-702-0425 (Phone)
773-702-0730 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/posner-e/

Jack Landman Goldsmith III

Harvard Law School ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
845
Rank
21,605
Abstract Views
4,494