Section 2 and Article 82: A Comparison of American and European Approaches to Monopolization Law

15 Pages Posted: 16 May 2006

See all articles by Keith N. Hylton

Keith N. Hylton

Boston University - School of Law

Date Written: October 2005

Abstract

This paper provides a general overview of the differences between American and European monopolization law. American courts have taken a relatively conservative approach toward monopolization law, in the sense of showing reluctance to penalize a firm simply because of its monopoly status, and of allowing wide scope, at least at the level of pure legal doctrine, for efficiency defenses to be asserted. Europe, in comparison, has taken an interventionist approach. Error-cost analysis provides a justification for the American approach. A preliminary empirical examination suggests that the scope of a country's monopolization law is inversely related its degree of trade dependence.

Keywords: Article 82 of the European Community Treaty, Sherman Act Section 2, monopolization law, American monopolization law, European monopolization law, error-cost analysis, scope of a country's monopolization law, degree of trade dependence

JEL Classification: K00, K21, K33

Suggested Citation

Hylton, Keith N., Section 2 and Article 82: A Comparison of American and European Approaches to Monopolization Law (October 2005). Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 06-11. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=902655 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.902655

Keith N. Hylton (Contact Author)

Boston University - School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-8959 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
571
Abstract Views
1,877
rank
46,805
PlumX Metrics