Interwar U.K. Unemployment: The Benjamin and Kochin Hypothesis or the Legacy of 'Just' Taxes?
FRB of Atlanta Working Paper No. 2006-4
17 Pages Posted: 18 May 2006
Date Written: May 2006
Abstract
Benjamin and Kochin (1979, Journal of Political Economy) present regression estimates to support their hypothesis that larger unemployment benefits increased U.K. unemployment post-World War I (WWI). The Benjamin-Kochin (BK) regression is easy to replicate. When the replication is widened to include income tax rates and WWI observations using Bayesian Monte Carlo methods, the evidence moves against the BK hypothesis and in favor of regressions that include the capital income tax rate. We explain these results with Daunton (2002, Just Taxes). He argues that U.K. tax rates were set during WWI and the interwar period to achieve an equitable, or just, mix of taxes and debt. Neoclassical theory suggests that capital income tax rates fluctuations created inefficient factor input allocations that drove up interwar U.K. unemployment.
Keywords: U.K. interwar unemployment, replacement ratio, capital income tax rate, Markov chain Monte Carlo
JEL Classification: E32, E62, N14, N34, N44
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Can Productivity Growth Explain NAIRU? Long-Run Evidence from Britain, 1871-1999
-
New Estimates of British Unemployment, 1870-1913
By George R. Boyer and Timothy J. Hatton
-
The McKenna Rule and U.K. World War I Finance
By James M. Nason and Shaun P. Vahey
-
Labour Markets in the Interwar Period and Economic Recovery in the UK and the USA
By Timothy J. Hatton and Mark Thomas
-
The Wage-Productivity Gap Revisited: Is the Labour Share Neutral to Employment?
By Marika Karanassou and Hector Sala
-
Managerial Incentive Mechanisms and Turnover of Company Presidents and Directors in Japan
By Naohito Abe