A Monte Carlo Study of Regressions
Stanford GSB Research Paper No. 1836(R)
56 Pages Posted: 22 May 2006
Date Written: August 2004
Abstract
Using Monte Carlo simulations, this paper evaluates the bias properties of common estimators used in growth regressions derived from the Solow model. We explicitly allow for measurement error in the right-hand side variables, as well as country-specific effects that are correlated with the regressors. Our results suggest that using an OLS estimator applied to a single cross-section of variables averaged over time (the between estimator) performs best in terms of the extent of bias on each of the estimated coeffcients. The fixed-effects estimator and the Arellano-Bond estimator greatly overstate the speed of convergence under a wide variety of assumptions concerning the type and extent of measurement error, while between understates it somewhat. Finally, fixed effects and Arellano-Bond bias towards zero the slope estimates on the human and physical capital accumulation variables.
Keywords: Growth regressions, measurement error
JEL Classification: O47, O57, C15, C23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models
By William Easterly and Ross Levine
-
Is Growth Exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer and Weil Seriously
-
Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth
By Robert J. Barro, N. Gregory Mankiw, ...
-
Relative Prices and Relative Prosperity
By Chang-tai Hsieh and Peter J. Klenow
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
By Jonathan Eaton and Samuel S. Kortum
-
The Tyranny of Concepts: Cudie (Cumulated, Depreciated Investment Effort) is Not Capital