Are Socially Responsible Investors Different from Conventional Investors? A Comparison Across Six Countries
32 Pages Posted: 31 May 2006
Date Written: December 2005
Abstract
This paper provides an empirical analysis of the differences between socially responsible investors (SRI) and conventional investors in six countries. We show that differences are seen more often in investor attitudes and behaviour rather than in other criteria such as demographics. SRI investors appear to care more about social criteria rather than financial and shareholder interests and are more likely to punish firms for poor social performance as consumers as well as in their investment choices. All investors believe that good corporate social performance leads to good financial performance but conventional investors do not appear to follow this through in their portfolios. Market context also appears to be important.
Keywords: Socially Responsible Investment, Demographics, Investor Attitudes
JEL Classification: G11, G14, G15, M14
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style
By Rogér Otten, Rob Bauer, ...
-
International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style
By Rob Bauer, Kees C. G. Koedijk, ...
-
Investing in Socially Responsible Mutual Funds
By Christopher Geczy, Robert F. Stambaugh, ...
-
The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle
By Jeroen Derwall, Rob Bauer, ...
-
Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices
By Alex Edmans
-
Corporate Social Performance and Stock Returns: UK Evidence from Disaggregate Measures
By Stephen J. Brammer, Chris Brooks, ...