Spurious Inference in the Garch(1,1) Model When it is Weakly Identified
28 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2006
Date Written: December 1, 2006
Abstract
This paper shows that the Zero-Information-Limit-Condition (ZILC) formulated by Nelson and Startz (2006) holds in the GARCH(1,1) model. As a result, the GARCH estimate tends to have too small a standard error relative to the true one when the ARCH parameter is small, even when sample size becomes very large. In combination with an upward bias in the GARCH estimate, the small standard error will often lead to the spurious inference that volatility is highly persistent when it is not. We develop an empirical strategy to deal with this issue and show how it applies to real datasets.
Keywords: weak identification, GARCH, conditional heteroskedasticity
JEL Classification: C12, C22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Is Garch(1,1) as Good a Model as the Accolades of the Nobel Prize Would Imply?
-
Stock Market Risk-Return Inference. An Unconditional, Non-Parametric Approach.
By Thomas Mikosch and Catalin Starica
-
A Non-Stationary Paradigm for the Dynamics of Multivariate Financial Returns
By Stefano Herzel, Catalin Starica, ...
-
By Marc Gürtler and Ronald Rauh
-
Forecasting VAR and Expected Shortfall Using Dynamical Systems: A Risk Management Strategy
By Dominique Guegan and Caillault Cyril
-
Forecasting VAR and Expected Shortfall Using Dynamical Systems: A Risk Management Strategy
By Cyril Caillault and Dominique Guegan
-
Two-Step Forecast: A Dynamic Approach to Study Intrinsic Value
By Nhat H. Le
-
A Multivariate Non-stationary Approach for Financial Returns with Nonparametric Heteroscedasticity
By Marc Gürtler, Jens‐peter Kreiss, ...