Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

On the Use of Classroom Experiments in 'Aligned' Teaching

Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp, 61-72, 2003

13 Pages Posted: 7 Jun 2006  

Stephen L. Cheung

The University of Sydney; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Abstract

The use of classroom experiments as a teaching-learning activity in economics courses is now well established and a healthy practitioners' literature has evolved around this topic. What is less satisfactory is the paucity of literature relating the adoption of these methods to the more generalised precepts of learning theory. As a result, advocates of classroom experiments have typically failed to articulate the rationale for their adoption in terms of the attainment by students of intended learning outcomes. This paper attempts to bridge this gap, using Biggs' principle of 'constructive alignment' as a framework. It is argued that there is potentially excellent alignment between the objectives of economics teaching and the use of experiments as a teaching-learning activity. However, this alignment may be distorted by inappropriate assessment. In particular, the practice of grading students on the profits they earn in experimental markets emphasises individual decision-making over higher-order understanding of the relationship between individual choices and the dynamics and outcomes in a market as a whole.

Keywords: Economics pedagogy, Classroom experiments

JEL Classification: A20, C90

Suggested Citation

Cheung, Stephen L., On the Use of Classroom Experiments in 'Aligned' Teaching. Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp, 61-72, 2003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=906694

Stephen L. Cheung (Contact Author)

The University of Sydney ( email )

School of Economics
Merewether Building H04
Sydney, NSW 2006
Australia
+61 2 9351 2135 (Phone)
+61 2 9351 4341 (Fax)

IZA Institute of Labor Economics

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Paper statistics

Downloads
70
Rank
279,798
Abstract Views
647