Footnotes (47)



Critical Constitutionalism Now

Louis Michael Seidman

Georgetown University Law Center

February 4, 2011

Fordham Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 575-592, November 2006
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 907101

The starting point for this essay is the claim that if the texts that critical scholars studied are unstable over time, then this must also be true of the studies themselves. There is no reason to suppose that the critical perspective, uniquely among all possible perspectives, reflects timeless and contextless truth. The question I want to ask, then, is what meaning the critical perspective has for us now in our new and dramatically transformed environment. I proceed in four parts. First, I address the meaning that critical scholars attributed to constitutional law in the late twentieth century. Second, I describe some of the features of the situation that produced this meaning. Third, I describe salient features of the current constitutional situation and how it differs from the situation from which critical constitutionalism emerged. Finally, I offer some suggestions for what critical constitutionalism means today.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: constitution, critical theory, separation of powers, critical legal studies, Bush administration

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 14, 2006 ; Last revised: September 18, 2015

Suggested Citation

Seidman, Louis Michael, Critical Constitutionalism Now (February 4, 2011). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 575-592, November 2006; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 907101. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=907101

Contact Information

Louis Michael Seidman (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
Washington, DC 20057
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,824
Downloads: 551
Download Rank: 37,800
Footnotes:  47