Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Death Bed

TriQuarterly Journal, Vol. 124, pp. 141-68, 2006

Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 908656

29 Pages Posted: 14 Jun 2006  

Deborah W. Denno

Fordham University School of Law

Abstract

Lethal injection is this country's primary method of execution, adopted for use by all but one of the thirty-seven death penalty states, as well as the federal government. It is predictable, then, that questions would arise the moment such a widely accepted form of punishment becomes especially vulnerable to an Eighth Amendment attack, as recent cases have shown. This article discusses this author's involvement as an expert in one of these cases, Baze v. Rees, which concerned a 2005 challenge to the constitutionality of lethal injection in Kentucky. While the Baze court upheld the constitutionality of Kentucky's lethal injection procedure, the opinion also revealed some extraordinary and unprecedented statements about the flaws of lethal injection as well as recommendations for how it should be improved. For example, the court found it cruel and unusual for the state's lethal injection protocol to enable an inmate's neck to be catheterized, a decision influenced by a department of corrections doctor who testified he would refuse to conduct the procedure, and that those who would were unqualified to do so. Baze is one of a series of opinions demonstrating that the more we know about how lethal injection is administered, the more problems we find with this means of execution.

Suggested Citation

Denno, Deborah W., Death Bed. TriQuarterly Journal, Vol. 124, pp. 141-68, 2006; Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 908656. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=908656

Deborah W. Denno (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

Fordham University School of Law
150 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-6868 (Phone)
212-636-6899 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
236
Rank
109,165
Abstract Views
2,339