Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 2006
32 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2006
In Chaoulli, a majority of the Canadian Supreme Court struck down a Quebec law that prohibited the purchase of private health insurance for essential hospital and physician services. A majority found it to be in breach of the Quebec Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The court was split 3:3 on whether it was also in breach of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The decision was initially considered of limited importance by many given that technically it applied only to Quebec. In the six months since the decision was released, however, it has become clear that the legal impact of Chaoulli will be dwarfed by its normative impact on policy debates across the country. Chaoulli has brought Canadian Medicare to a fork in the road. At the time of writing, critical decisions are about to be taken across the country. Unfortunately, the level of debate about public and private insurance that has been sparked by Chaoulli reflects the poor account of public and private insurance dynamics in the Chaoulli decision itself. I discuss the majority judges' poor appreciation of the interface between public and private health insurance across different health care systems and how, subsequently, this lack of understanding has been reflected in media discussions of policy options. I also discuss likely future challenges in other provinces before moving on to the most critical aspect of all of this - governmental response and what the future holds for Canadian Medicare.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Flood, Colleen M., Chaoulli's Legacy for the Future of Canadian Health Care Policy. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 2006; U Toronto, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 909262. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=909262