Brougham on Zeal - a Reply to Zacharias and Green

11 Pages Posted: 17 Jun 2006

See all articles by Monroe H. Freedman

Monroe H. Freedman

Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law

Date Written: June 2006

Abstract

In a recent article, Professors Fred Zacharias and Bruce Green erroneously wrote that Henry Lord Brougham had repudiated his famous statement on the advocate's duty of zealous representation. I wrote a response for the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, pointing out the error. Instead of simply acknowledging the mistake and moving on with their main point, Zacharias and Green have written a response, attempting to justify their error. This reply attempts to put the issue finally to rest.

Keywords: Brougham, Zeal

Suggested Citation

Freedman, Monroe H., Brougham on Zeal - a Reply to Zacharias and Green (June 2006). Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-15. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=909278 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.909278

Monroe H. Freedman (Contact Author)

Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )

121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
117
Abstract Views
1,123
rank
234,676
PlumX Metrics