In the Fair Hearing Room: Resistance and Confrontation in the Welfare Bureaucracy
42 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2006
Abstract
This article explores how welfare clients use and experience the fair hearing system, the administrative mechanism for challenging denials or reductions of aid in public welfare bureaucracies in the United States. Drawing on data from in-depth interviews with clients, it explores how old-style procedural protections like fair hearings are being used to challenge new-style welfare reforms. This research found that clients use fair hearings as a form of resistance and self-assertion, hoping that it will protect them from a bureaucracy perceived as arbitrary and capricious. Like many citizens, they are as concerned with being heard by their governmental institutions as they are with the outcome of their case, and want to find within the machinery of government a forum where they can obtain recompense and respect. However, the legalistic and rule-bound nature of hearings makes it difficult for clients to present their claims, and meaningful participation is often denied them.
Keywords: administrative hearings, welfare reform
JEL Classification: I38, D73
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Lawyers' Pro Bono Service and American-Style Civil Legal Assistance
-
Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality
-
Justice from Above or Justice from Below? Popular Strategies for Resolving Grievances in Rural China