Juries, Judges, and Punitive Damages: Empirical Analyses Using the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts 1992, 1996, and 2001 Data
33 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2006
Abstract
We analyze thousands of trials from a substantial fraction of the nation's most populous counties. Evidence across ten years and three major datasets suggests that: (1) juries and judges award punitive damages in approximately the same ratio to compensatory damages, (2) the level of punitive damages awards has not increased, and (3) juries' and judges' tendencies to award punitive damages differ in bodily injury and no-bodily-injury cases. Jury trials are associated with a greater rate of punitive damages awards in financial injury cases. Judge trials are associated with a greater rate of punitive damages awards in bodily injury cases.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
How Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs Fare in Federal Court
-
Plaintiphobia in State Courts? An Empirical Study of State Court Trials on Appeal
By Theodore Eisenberg and Michael Heise
-
Plaintiphobia in State Courts Redux? An Empirical Study of State Court Trials on Appeal
By Theodore Eisenberg and Michael Heise
-
Plaintiphobia in the Appellate Courts: Civil Rights Really Do Differ from Negotiable Instruments?
-
The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: the Paradox of Losing by Winning
-
Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs in Federal Court: From Bad to Worse?