Delegation Versus Veto in Organizational Games of Strategic Communication
20 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2006
Date Written: July 5, 2006
Abstract
In organizations, principals use decision rules to govern a more informed agent's behavior. We compare two such rules: delegation and veto. Recent work suggests that delegation dominates veto unless the divergence in preferences between the principal and the agent is so large that informative communication can not take place. We show that this result does not hold in a reasonable model of veto versus delegation. In this model, veto dominates delegation for any feasible divergence in preferences, if it induces the agent to shut down low quality proposals that he would otherwise implement and if such projects have sufficient likelihood.
Keywords: veto, delegation
JEL Classification: L2
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Balanced Budget Rules and Public Deficits: Evidence from the U.S. States
By Henning Bohn and Robert P. Inman
-
Capital Budgeting and Delegation
By Milton Harris and Artur Raviv
-
Capital Budgeting and Compensation with Asymmetric Information and Moral Hazard
By Antonio E. Bernardo, Hongbin Cai, ...
-
Budget Referendums and Government Spending: Evidence from Swiss Cantons
By Lars P. Feld and John G. Matsusaka
-
Decision Processes, Agency Problems, and Information: An Economic Analysis of Budget Procedures
-
Decision Processes, Agency Problems, and Information: An Economic Analysis of Budget Procedures
-
Economic Incentives and Political Institutions: Spending and Voting in School Budget Agenda
By Thomas Romer, Howard Rosenthal, ...
-
Allocation of Decision-Making Authority
By Milton Harris and Artur Raviv
-
Why the NPV Criterion Does Not Maximize NPV
By Elazar Berkovitch and Ronen Israel
-
By Ricardo Alonso and Niko Matouschek