Accountability of Non-State Actors in Uganda for War Crimes and Human Rights Violations: Between Amnesty and the International Criminal Court

Posted: 29 Feb 2008

See all articles by Manisuli Ssenyonjo

Manisuli Ssenyonjo

Brunel University London - Department of Social Sciences, Media and Communications

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

The armed conflict in northern Uganda, between the Lord`s Resistance Army (LRA) rebels and the Ugandan government, is one of Africa`s longest running armed conflicts not of an international character. It has lasted for nearly two decades. In the course of the conflict, serious war crimes of concern to the international community as a whole - particularly intentionally directing attacks (regular use of torture, mutilation, murder and abduction) by the LRA against the civilian population not taking direct part in hostilities - have been committed with complete impunity. This has led to a gross and consistent pattern of human rights violations. Through amnesty, the Ugandan government has, since 2000, expressed readiness to forgive the LRA rebels and their leader, Joseph Kony, of war crimes, if they denounced the rebellion. Yet, the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague has, since 2004, at the request of the Ugandan government, been investigating war crimes committed in the nineteen-year-old conflict between the LRA and the government and recently expressed readiness to issue arrest warrants for the LRA leader Joseph Kony and several of the top brass of the LRA. It has been argued that the ICC`s effort to attain justice through prosecution while peace still eludes the region risks, in the end, achieving neither justice nor peace. This article considers the question whether the domestic amnesty law is counterproductive to the ICC`s work. While acknowledging the need for forgiveness and reintegration, it is argued that those who `bear the greatest responsibility for the crimes committed` should be brought to justice. However, it is acknowledged that since almost 80 per cent of the LRA`s soldiers are children who have been abducted from their families and forced to commit horrendous crimes against their own people, the ICC faces the difficulty of categorising members of the LRA as victims (those who deserve amnesty) or perpetrators (those who should be prosecuted). The ICC needs to be successful in Uganda - one of its first operations - in order to demonstrate to the international community that it is an effective instrument.

Keywords: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, dementia, buried bumper syndrome

Suggested Citation

Ssenyonjo, Manisuli, Accountability of Non-State Actors in Uganda for War Crimes and Human Rights Violations: Between Amnesty and the International Criminal Court ( 2005). Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 405-434, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=915654

Manisuli Ssenyonjo (Contact Author)

Brunel University London - Department of Social Sciences, Media and Communications ( email )

Kingston Lane
Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,532
PlumX Metrics