Universal Jurisdiction: Clarifying the Basic Concept

Posted: 29 Feb 2008

See all articles by Roger O'Keefe

Roger O'Keefe

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

Date Written: September 2004

Abstract

Academic analysis of the Arrest Warrant case in the International Court of Justice has tended to focus to date on the Court`s judgment on immunity. Comparatively little attention has been paid to the question of universal jurisdiction, as discussed in detail in most of the separate and dissenting opinions and declarations. The following article focuses less on the various judges` conclusions as to the international lawfulness of universal jurisdiction than on their treatment of the basic concept. The article argues that this treatment is open to question, reflecting, as it does, both a conceptual conflation of states` jurisdiction to prescribe their criminal law with the manner of that law`s enforcement and an inattention to crucial temporal considerations. As well as fostering dubious terminology, these factors lead some judges to an unsatisfying conclusion regarding the permissibility of the enforcement in absentia of universal jurisdiction, and cause others to underestimate the degree of state practice in favour of universal jurisdiction over crimes under general international law.

Suggested Citation

O'Keefe, Roger, Universal Jurisdiction: Clarifying the Basic Concept (September 2004). Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 2, Issue 3, pp. 735-760, 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=915673

Roger O'Keefe (Contact Author)

University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,215
PlumX Metrics