Are More Competitive Banking Systems More Stable?
37 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2006
Abstract
Using the Panzar and Rosse H-Statistic as a measure of competition in 45 countries, we find that more competitive banking systems are less prone to experience a systemic crisis and exhibit increased time to crisis. This result holds even when we control for banking system concentration, which is associated with higher probability of crisis and shorter time to crisis. Our results indicate that competition and concentration capture different characteristics of banking systems, meaning that concentration is an inappropriate proxy for competition. Our findings suggest that policies promoting competition among banks, if well executed, have potential to improve systemic stability.
Keywords: systemic risk, Banking competition, Market structure, Regulation
JEL Classification: C41, G21, G28, L11
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Bank Risk Taking and Competition Revisited
By John H. Boyd and Gianni De Nicolo
-
Liberalization, Moral Hazard in Banking and Prudential Regulation: Are Capital Requirements Enough?
-
Competition and Financial Stability
By Franklin Allen and Douglas M. Gale
-
Capital Requirements, Market Power and Risk-Taking in Banking
-
Size, Charter Value and Risk in Banking: An International Perspective
-
Competition and Stability: What's Special About Banking?
By Elena Carletti and Philipp Hartmann
-
Bank Risk-Taking and Competition Revisited: New Theory and New Evidence
By John H. Boyd, Gianni De Nicolo, ...
-
By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-kunt, ...
-
By Thorsten Beck, Asli Demirgüç-kunt, ...