Patenting and Licensing of Financial Innovations
46 Pages Posted: 18 Jul 2006
Date Written: July 2006
Abstract
Recent court decisions, starting with the State Street decision in 1998, allow business methods to be patentable and now give financial institutions the option to seek patent protection for financial innovations. We develop a dynamic model that incorporates salient aspects of the adoption and dissemination of financial innovations. We find, somewhat surprisingly, that patent protection may be detrimental to long-term profits because of embedded real options for further innovations and market expansion that are especially important for financial firms. Moreover, a strategy of patenting and then licensing may not be effective because of expertise-related constraints of the licensees. Our framework helps understand the success of a wide class of innovations including swaps, credit derivatives, and pricing algorithms; it also helps financial institutions decide whether it is optimal to exercise the patentability and licensing option.
Keywords: Business Methods, Financial Innovations, Patents, Licenses, Real Options
JEL Classification: G20, L10, O31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Where Does State Street Lead?: A First Look at Finance Patents, 1971-2000
By Josh Lerner
-
Where Does State Street Lead? A First Look at Finance Patents, 1971-2000
By Josh Lerner
-
Antitrust Limits to Patent Settlements
By Carl Shapiro
-
Is Innovation King at the Antitrust Agencies? The Intellectual Property Guidelines Five Years Later
By Richard Gilbert and Willard K. Tom
-
The Litigation of Financial Innovations
By Josh Lerner
-
Privacy-Preserving Methods for Sharing Financial Risk Exposures
By Emmanuel A. Abbe, Amir Khandani, ...
-
Is Propensity to Innovate a Priced Risk in a Global Financial Institution Multifactor Pricing Model?