Parol Evidence Under the Cisg: The 'Homeward Trend' Reconsidered

28 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2006  

Karen Halverson Cross

John Marshall Law School in Chicago

Abstract

The CISG has been described as one of history's most successful attempts to harmonize international commercial law. Consistent with its goal of harmonizing the law of international sales, Article 7(1) of the CISG instructs courts and arbitrators to interpret the Convention in light of "its international character and the need to promote uniformity in its application." MCC-Marble v. Ceramica Nuova D'Agostina is a U.S. decision that has been praised for its adherence to Article 7(1). In contrast with conventional academic commentary, which praises MCC-Marble and criticizes the tendency of courts to interpret the CISG in light of their respective domestic legal traditions (the 'homeward trend'), this essay critiques MCC-Marble as a decision that emphasizes uniformity at the expense of other important considerations. Notwithstanding Article 7(1), uniformity was not the exclusive goal of the CISG project. Although it may result in some inconsistency in the Convention's implementation, the homeward trend also should enhance the CISG's legitimacy and acceptability over the long term. MCC-Marble is examined to illustrate how its interpretative approach to the CISG's provisions regarding parol evidence may exacerbate the tendency of U.S. parties to opt out of the CISG. The essay argues for an interpretation of the CISG that allows greater weight to be afforded the terms of a final written agreement.

Suggested Citation

Cross, Karen Halverson, Parol Evidence Under the Cisg: The 'Homeward Trend' Reconsidered. Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 68, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=917904

Karen H. Cross (Contact Author)

John Marshall Law School in Chicago ( email )

315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
273
Rank
90,198
Abstract Views
2,441