Law and Economics of Plea-Bargaining
28 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 2006
Date Written: July 2006
Abstract
Although highly criticized by legal scholars, plea-bargaining is probably the most transplanted instrument of criminal procedure. In contrast to most of the legal literature, Law and Economics is quite optimistic about it. In this paper, we take the view that such optimism is not well founded. Our approach is based on the view of plea-bargaining as part of a nexus of relationships that undermines the efficiency argument. In particular, we find it quite important to assess the defendant's lawyer's incentives and the prosecutor's goals, both of which are rather neglected in Law and Economics. Other aspects we consider are the interests of the victims and judicial scrutiny. Our conclusions temper the usual Law and Economics optimism.
Keywords: Plea-Bargaining, Defendant, Prosecution, Judicial Scrutiny
JEL Classification: K4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Judge Shopping: Testing Whether Judges' Political Orientations Affect Case Filings
-
The Effect of the Election of Prosecutors on Criminal Trials
-
Prosecutor and Lawyers in Plea Bargaining with Complete Information
By Lydie Ancelot and Philippe Delacote
-
Conflict and Leadership: Why is There a Hawkish Drift in Politics?
-
Non-Stranger Identification: How Accurately Do Eyewitnesses Determine If a Person is Familiar
By Kathy Pezdek and Stacia Stolzenberg