Individual or Collective Liability for Corporate Directors?

43 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2006 Last revised: 7 Oct 2010

Darian M. Ibrahim

William & Mary Law School

Abstract

Fiduciary duty is one of the most litigated areas in corporate law, and the subject of much academic attention, yet one important question has been ignored. Should fiduciary liability be assessed individually, where directors are examined one-by-one for compliance, or collectively, where the board's compliance as a whole is all that matters? The choice between individual and collective assessment can be the difference between a director's liability and her exoneration, affects how boards function, and informs the broader fiduciary duty literature in important ways. This article is the first to explore the individual/collective question and suggest a systematic way of approaching it. The article is both descriptive, in examining how some courts have answered this question (often implicitly), and normative, in asking whether the courts' tentative answer makes for good corporate governance policy.

Keywords: Corporate, Board, Director, Disney, Fiduciary Duty, Duty of Loyalty, Duty of Care, Good Faith

JEL Classification: K22

Suggested Citation

Ibrahim, Darian M., Individual or Collective Liability for Corporate Directors?. Iowa Law Review, Vol. 93, p. 929, 2008; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 06-25. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=918119

Darian M. Ibrahim (Contact Author)

William & Mary Law School ( email )

South Henry Street
P.O. Box 8795
Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
679
Rank
29,777
Abstract Views
3,935