Stigmata: The Stain of Sarbanes-Oxley on U.S. Capital Markets
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 224
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 224
Duquesne Business Law Journal vol. 9 p. 126 (2007)
58 Pages Posted: 14 Sep 2006 Last revised: 24 Apr 2009
Date Written: November 8, 2006
Abstract
In response to the dramatic fall of corporate icons such as Enron and other U.S. companies, Congress promulgated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX"). In doing so, Congress triggered a chain reaction that has negatively impacted U.S. equity markets and changed the face of capital raising throughout the world. SOX has not only taxed U.S. businesses it has tarnished the face of U.S. equity markets. This paper demonstrates through a statistical analysis of global IPO data that the U.S. equity markets have indeed suffered from the implementation of SOX. In addition, this paper found a palpable increase in non-domestic capital raising in locations such as London and Hong Kong. This paper further isolated the role of Chinese IPOs in the global IPO market. Jockeying for Chinese IPOs has increased the competitiveness of the foreign IPO market and raised the stakes in regulation of exchanges. SOX has reduced demand for U.S. equity market participation by foreign companies and threatens the competitiveness of U.S. markets. U.S. capital markets no longer dominate the foreign IPO arena. Regional exchanges have grown in market capitalization and reduced the importance of the U.S. markets. Foreign companies seeking to raise capital should be aware of the shift in the global capital markets but also note the advantages of offering securities on foreign exchanges despite the regulatory hurdles. Finally, this paper acknowledges the upswing in regulatory efforts in the U.S. markets and offers an alternative path to regulation in its current form that may partially restore the attraction of U.S. markets to foreign issuers.
[White paper dated as of Nov. 2006]
NOTE: Published version: Duquesne Business Law Journal vol. 9 p. 126 (2007). My follow-up to this paper analyzing additional IPO data, etc was cut short by the credit crunch.
Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley Act, SOX, Corporate Governance, Foreign, Initial Public Offering, IPO, Corporate, Foreign Issuer, SEC, NYSE, NASDAQ, AIM, London, Hong Kong, Singapore, China, Section 404, Market Capitalization, Accounting, Financial Disclosure, Reporting, Certification, Exchange Act of 1934
JEL Classification: G15, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
By Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
By Ivo Welch and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos: Theory and Evidence
-
Common Stock Offerings Across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence
By Hyuk Choe, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert