Valuing Coastal and Ocean Ecosystem Services: The Paradox of Scarcity for Marine Resources Commodities and the Potential Role of Lifestyle Value Competition
Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 355, Spring 2007
Florida State University College of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 208
56 Pages Posted: 4 Aug 2006 Last revised: 13 Oct 2007
There are 2 versions of this paper
Valuing Coastal and Ocean Ecosystem Services: The Paradox of Scarcity for Marine Resources Commodities and the Potential Role of Lifestyle Value Competition
Valuing Coastal and Ocean Ecosystem Services: The Paradox of Scarcity for Marine Resources Commodities and the Potential Role of Lifestyle Value Competition
Abstract
Ocean and coastal ecosystems provide about two-thirds of the ecosystem services that make up the world's natural capital. Despite that fact, the political will to adequately protect these marine ecosystems in marine protected areas and marine reserves generally does not exist. Instead, regulation focuses where the markets focus: on commercial commodities demands for ocean and coastal resources. This traditional commodities-focused market-and-regulatory regime has proven inadequate to protect functional marine ecosystems, as the history of wetlands loss and fishery regulation failure makes clear.
This paper argues that neither the commodities market nor a private property regime is likely to strengthen the political will to protect and preserve marine ecosystems as a whole. Nor, given the paradigm of inexhaustibility, the failure to perceive marine resources as scarce, and the lack of public understanding about the importance of marine ecosystem services, is strengthened political will likely to follow from the numerous scientific recommendations that the United States protect about 20 percent of its ocean resources in marine protected areas and marine reserves.
Instead, this paper explores the potential of new markets for the lifestyle values of marine resources amenities to serve as proxy for a direct public demand for intact and functional marine ecosystems. Specifically, the paper argues that new consumer demands for recreational opportunities, tourism, and eco-living may provide sufficient use competition - specifically, competition between commodities and amenities users - to translate the new economic demands into a political will to better protect marine ecosystems and the services that they provide.
Keywords: ecosystem services, ocean, coast, coastal, markets, commodities, amenities, scarcity, fishing, overfishing, wetlands, development, ocean policy
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Governing for Sustainable Coasts: Complexity, Climate Change, and Coastal Ecosystem Protection
By Robin Kundis Craig and J. B. Ruhl
-
The Battle Over Endangered Species Act Methodology
By J. B. Ruhl
-
Marine Reserves, the Public Trust Doctrine and Intergenerational Equity
-
Endangered Species Act Innovations in the Post-Babbittonian Era - Are There Any?
By J. B. Ruhl
-
Sustainable Development: A Five-Dimensional Algorithm for Environmental Law
By J. B. Ruhl
-
Marine Protected Areas, Marine Spatial Planning, and the Resilience of Marine Ecosystems
By Robin Kundis Craig and Terry Hughes