Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs

77 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 1, 2005


The author critically reviews the methods available for the ex-post counterfactual analysis of programs that are assigned exclusively to individuals, households, or locations. The discussion covers both experimental and non-experimental methods (including propensity-score matching, discontinuity designs, double and triple differences, and instrumental variables). Two main lessons emerge. First, despite the claims of advocates, no single method dominates; rigorous, policy-relevant evaluations should be open-minded about methodology. Second, future efforts to draw more useful lessons from evaluations will call for more policy-relevant measures and deeper explanations of measured impacts than are possible from the classic ("black box") assessment of mean impact.

Keywords: Poverty Monitoring & Analysis, Rural Poverty Reduction, Scientific Research & Science Parks, Science Education, Poverty Impact Evaluation

Suggested Citation

Ravallion, Martin, Evaluating Anti-Poverty Programs (June 1, 2005). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3625, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=922915

Martin Ravallion (Contact Author)

Georgetown University ( email )

Washington, DC 20057
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics