25 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2006 Last revised: 29 Apr 2013
Date Written: August 1, 2006
In June 2005, the Supreme Court in a Five to Four Decision marked its most controversial decision in recent memory. The case of Kelo v. City of New London, set off a fire storm of response to the Court's ruling that economic development takings satisfied the Fifth Amendment. This essay is about how the Court uses words, how the defining ability of words create institutional space in which the Court operates, and which defines things beyond the words. The essay focuses on notions of Space and Place to define physical ideas and institutional ideas.
Keywords: Kelo, Constitutional Law, Fifth Amendment, Emminent domain, space, place, o'connor
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Roark, Marc Lane, The Constitution as Idea: Defining Describing Deciding in Kelo (August 1, 2006). California Western Law Review, Vol. 43, No. 363, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=923439 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.923439
By Marc Roark
By Jane Baron