Bargaining for Bribes: The Role of Institutions
18 Pages Posted: 10 Aug 2006
Date Written: June 2006
Abstract
We develop a simple bargaining framework of corruption where firms pay bribes to avoid regulation. Consistent with this setup, we find that time spent bargaining with bureaucrats and amount of bribe payments are positively correlated, but that this association is weaker (and, thus, corruption more efficient) when the terms of unofficial contracts are known to the firms. We also show that institutional arrangements that result in lower uncertainty in bargaining for bribes attenuate the impact of corruption on firm growth.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia
-
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Firms
-
Who Must Pay Bribes and How Much? Evidence from a Cross-Section of Firms
-
Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from "Missing Imports" in China
By Raymond J. Fisman and Shang-jin Wei
-
Tax Rates and Tax Evasion: Evidence from 'Missing Imports' in China
By Raymond J. Fisman and Shang-jin Wei
-
The Role of Wages and Auditing During a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires
-
By Edward L. Glaeser and Raven E. Saks
-
By Edward L. Glaeser and Raven E. Saks
-
By Anand Swamy, Young Lee, ...
-
What Determines Corruption? International Evidence from Micro Data