The Content of Reports on Italian Stocks: Do Evaluation Methods Matter?

27 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2006

See all articles by Giorgio Stefano Bertinetti

Giorgio Stefano Bertinetti

Ca Foscari University of Venice - Department of Management

Elisa Cavezzali

Ca Foscari University of Venice - Department of Management

Ugo Rigoni

Ca Foscari University of Venice - Department of Management

Date Written: July 2006

Abstract

The paper presents an empirical study on the content of reports on Italian stocks. We collected 4,603 reports regarding 29 blue chips listed in Italian stock market and released during years 2000-2003 by important brokers and investment firms. We carefully examined each report to find out the evaluation method used to get the final recommendation. The first puzzling finding is that for most of reports (about 70%) it is not possible to understand clearly the evaluation method used. This behaviour is coherent only with a very strong reputation effect, so that it does not matter why an analyst says something but only what he says and who he is. Then we restricted the analysis to reports whose main evaluation method was elicit. We divided evaluation methods into two main categories: the one based on market ratios and the one on fundamental analysis, that is the in-depth estimation of future profits and cash flows. The two methods occur with a quite similar proportion, but the year by year approach shows that the situation has changed through time. While in year 2000 market ratios were above fundamental analysis, in the following three years the weight of market ratios has constantly declined and in year 2003 the position was reversed. At last, we assessed whether the evaluation methods have some impact on the estimates, measured by recommendation's delta ((Target price - Current price)/Current price). But we did not find any significant relation: it doesn't matter if the report is based mainly on supposed original estimates, which is the typical feature of fundamental analysis, or on well known market data. The quality and the value of a report, if there are any, don't rely on the evaluation method used.

Keywords: security analysts, financial analysts' reports, evaluation methods, stock recommendations, target prices

JEL Classification: G11, G14, G24, G29, M41, M47

Suggested Citation

Bertinetti, Giorgio Stefano and Cavezzali, Elisa and Rigoni, Ugo, The Content of Reports on Italian Stocks: Do Evaluation Methods Matter? (July 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=926043 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.926043

Giorgio Stefano Bertinetti (Contact Author)

Ca Foscari University of Venice - Department of Management ( email )

San Giobbe, Cannaregio 873
Venice, 30121
Italy

Elisa Cavezzali

Ca Foscari University of Venice - Department of Management ( email )

San Giobbe, Cannaregio 873
Venice, 30121
Italy

Ugo Rigoni

Ca Foscari University of Venice - Department of Management ( email )

San Giobbe, Cannaregio 873
Venice, 30121
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
260
Abstract Views
1,973
rank
147,296
PlumX Metrics