Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 67, 2004
23 Pages Posted: 29 Aug 2006 Last revised: 19 Apr 2017
Date Written: 2004
This article examines the apparent contradictions in Singaporean interpretation and application of its Westminster modeled Constitution in which the Constitution is treated as any other piece of legislation and Western style individual rights are easily overrun. It also examines the Government's particularist claim to Asian values as an explanation for its handling of the Constitution and seeks an alternative approach to understand the Constitution with reference to the Government publication, the Shared Values. The author suggests that this Document serves as a quasi-Constitution, and finds that interpreting two leading cases with this hermeneutic leads to a more satisfactory understanding of the court's decisions. The article concludes that the Government's approach toward the law to create the society it envisioned and published in the Document is a different and pragmatic issue, rather than a result of any fundamental East versus West cultural difference.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Sheehy, Benedict, Singapore, 'Shared Values' and Law: Non East Versus West Constitutional Hermeneutic (2004). Hong Kong Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 67, 2004. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=926720