Is Honesty the Best Policy? An Experimental Study on the Honesty of Feedback in Employer-Employee Relationships
49 Pages Posted: 6 Sep 2006
Date Written: September 2006
Abstract
We theoretically and experimentally examine a situation in which the principal has better information about the agent's ability than the agent himself. The principal can inform the agent about his ability by giving him performance feedback but there might be incentives for her to lie about it. Analyzing a simple signaling model yields the following results. (1) The principal only tells the truth if there are sufficiently high costs of lying. (2) When the principal's marginal return on the agent's effort increases, deception is more likely to occur. We observed ambiguity, however, when testing these theoretical results in a lab experiment. On one hand, the data provide evidence indicating that subjects indeed suffer from costs of lying in this context. On the other hand, we do not find more deception with higher marginal return on the agents' effort for the principal. Instead we observe exactly the opposite pattern: higher marginal returns on the agents' effort lead to more honest principals.
Keywords: experiment, honesty, performance feedback
JEL Classification: M12, M2, M5
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence
By Tor Eriksson, Anders Poulsen, ...
-
Feedback and Incentives: Experimental Evidence
By Tor Eriksson, Anders Poulsen, ...
-
Deception and Incentives: How Dishonesty Undermines Effort Provision
By Florian Ederer and Ernst Fehr
-
By Ghazala Azmat and Nagore Iriberri
-
Information Disclosure in Multistage Tournaments
By Maria Goltsman and Arijit Mukherjee
-
Feedback in Tournaments Under Commitment Problems: Theory and Experimental Evidence
By Oliver Gürtler and Christine Harbring