Creditor Control Rights and Firm Investment Policy
48 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2006 Last revised: 14 Sep 2014
Date Written: April 2008
Abstract
We present novel empirical evidence that conflicts of interest between creditors and their borrowers have a significant impact on firm investment policy. We examine a large sample of private credit agreements between banks and public firms and find that 32% of the agreements contain an explicit restriction on the firm's capital expenditures. Creditors are more likely to impose a capital expenditure restriction as a borrower's credit quality deteriorates, and the use of a restriction appears at least as sensitive to borrower credit quality as other contractual terms, such as interest rates, collateral requirements, or the use of financial covenants. We find that capital expenditure restrictions cause a reduction in firm investment and that firms obtaining contracts with a new restriction experience subsequent increases in their market value and operating performance.
Keywords: Control Rights, Investment Policy, Financial Contracting, Financial Covenants, Capital Expenditures, Creditor Control
JEL Classification: D23, G31, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Large-Sample Evidence on the Debt Covenant Hypothesis
By Ilia D. Dichev and Douglas J. Skinner
-
How Does Financing Impact Investment? The Role of Debt Covenants
By Sudheer Chava and Michael R. Roberts
-
Performance Pricing in Bank Debt Contracts
By Paul Asquith, Anne Beatty, ...
-
Borrower Risk and the Price and Nonprice Terms of Bank Loans
-
On Loan Sales, Loan Contracting, and Lending Relationships
By Steven Drucker and Manju Puri