Supreme Court Law Clerks' Recollections of Brown v. Board of Education II

64 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2006 Last revised: 22 Mar 2018

See all articles by John Q. Barrett

John Q. Barrett

St. John's University School of Law; Robert H. Jackson Center

Gordon B. Davidson

Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs

Daniel J. Meador


Earl E Pollock

Independent Author

E. Barrett Prettyman

Hogan Lovells

Date Written: 2005


When the Supreme Court unanimously decided Brown v. Board of Education and Bolling v. Sharpe on May 17, 1954, it did not decree a remedy for the segregated public school systems that it was declaring to be unconstitutional. Instead, the Court restored the school cases to its docket for the coming Term and ordered further briefing and oral argument on questions relating to the appropriate remedy.

One year later, on May 31, 1955, the Supreme Court announced the decision that has come to be known as Brown II. The Court, again unanimously, decreed that it was remanding the cases to the trial courts that had heard them originally, and it ordered those courts to fashion decrees that would admit Negro students to schools on a non-discriminatory basis "with all deliberate speed."

On May 18, 2005, two weeks before the 50th anniversary of Brown II, the Robert H. Jackson Center in Jamestown, New York, and the Supreme Court Historical Society assembled four attorneys who served as Supreme Court law clerks during 1954-1955 for a discussion of Brown II. In this roundtable, the attorneys share recollections of experiences at the Supreme Court during that year, and of working in the judicial process that culminated in Brown II.

The introduction to this discussion traces the history of Brown v. Board of Education and its companion cases in the Supreme Court. It includes new discoveries, including circumstantial evidence that the Justices did not, contrary to Chief Justice Warren's memoir, actually vote on Brown I until March 1954; some detail on Gerald Gunther's central involvement in Brown II as Warren's law clerk; and information on the six law clerks who worked on special, undisclosed-to-the-parties factual research for the Justices as they considered the Brown II remedy question.

Keywords: Brown v. Board of Education, Bolling v. Sharpe, Chief Justice Earl Warren, Justice Hugo L. Black, Justice John M. Harlan, Justice Robert H. Jackson, Justice Stanley F. Reed, segregation, schools, Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court law clerks, Gerald Gunther, all deliberate speed

Suggested Citation

Barrett, John Q. and Davidson, Gordon B. and Meador, Daniel J. and Pollock, Earl E. and Prettyman, E. Barrett, Supreme Court Law Clerks' Recollections of Brown v. Board of Education II (2005). St. John's Law Review, Vol. 79, pp. 823-885, Fall 2005; St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 06-0051. Available at SSRN:

John Q. Barrett (Contact Author)

St. John's University School of Law ( email )

8000 Utopia Parkway
Queens, NY 11439
United States
718-990-6644 (Phone)
718-990-2199 (Fax)


Robert H. Jackson Center

305 East Fourth Street
Jamestown, NY 14701
United States
716-483-6646 (Phone)
716-483-0690 (Fax)


Gordon B. Davidson

Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs ( email )

Louisville, KY 40202-2898
United States

Daniel J. Meador



Earl E. Pollock

Independent Author ( email )

No Address Available

E. Barrett Prettyman

Hogan Lovells ( email )

555 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
United States

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics