Distinction Bias: Misprediction and Mischoice Due to Joint Evaluation
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 86, No. 5, 2004
16 Pages Posted: 11 Oct 2006
Abstract
This research identifies a new source of failure to make accurate affective predictions or to make experientially optimal choices. When people make predictions or choices, they are often in the joint evaluation (JE) mode; when people actually experience an event, they are often in the single evaluation (SE) mode. The "utility function" of an attribute can vary systematically between SE and JE. When people in JE make predictions or choices for events to be experienced in SE, they often resort to their JE preferences rather than their SE preferences and overpredict the difference that different values of an attribute (e.g., different salaries) will make to their happiness in SE. This overprediction is referred to as the distinction bias. The present research also specifies when the distinction bias occurs and when it does not. This research contributes to literatures on experienced utility, affective forecasting, and happiness.
Keywords: evaluability, joint evaluation, separate evaluation, affective-forecasting, experienced utility
JEL Classification: D81, D11, D12, D91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Christopher K. Hsee, George Loewenstein, ...
-
Preference Reversals and the Measurement of Environmental Values
By Julie R. Irwin, Paul Slovic, ...
-
Music, Pandas, and Muggers: On the Affective Psychology of Value
-
Elastic Justification: How Tempting But Task-Irrelevant Factors Influence Decisions
-
Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence Judgments
-
Lay Rationalism and Inconsistency between Predicted Experience and Decision
By Christopher K. Hsee, Frank Yu, ...
-
A Meta-Analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
By James J. Murphy, P. Geoffrey Allen, ...
-
Less is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued More Highly than High-Value Options