Implications of the 'IAS Regulation' for Research into the International Differences in Accounting Systems
Accounting in Europe, Vol. 3, pp. 187-217, 2006
35 Pages Posted: 19 Sep 2006
Abstract
Meek and Thomas (2004) call for research on the continued relevance of 'rediscovered' dichotomous accounting classifications. We provide such evidence by examining how developments surrounding the 'IAS Regulation' (1606/2002) influenced international differences in accounting systems in the European Union. Since sufficient post-2005 IFRS data is not yet observable, we propose an initial re-classification of accounting systems based on evidence available to date, i.e. the degree of implementation of the IAS Regulation in the Member States. Consistent with Nobes (1998), we find that the degree of public accountability to outside investors (the 'public/private' criterion) is becoming the primary differentiator for accounting systems in Europe, surpassing country-level variables such as legal system and culture. The distinction between consolidated and individual financial statements is the second emerging differentiator. While consolidated accounting is becoming more uniform across countries, cross-country cultural differences are most likely to persist in individual accounting. Based on our analysis we highlight two important areas of future research beyond the consolidated financial statements of listed firms (e.g., Nobes, 2005; Schipper, 2005). First, at the country level, the interaction of IFRS and individual financial statements will need to be re-assessed. In addition, research could help introduce a degree of differentiation into financial reporting regulation for unlisted firms, because these firms are not a homogeneous group. Also, the convergence of national GAAP systems with IFRS will benefit from fresh research insights. Second, at the firm level, future research could analyze the extent to which the determinants and consequences of IFRS adoption, an area well-researched for publicly traded firms (e.g., Cuijpers and Buijink, 2005), generalize to unlisted firms. Such research will help detect emerging patterns of accounting systems within an international context. It will generate insights into the disconnect of consolidated accounts from national influences, the degree of uniformity of consolidated accounts among international firms, the continued relevance of traditional classifications of international accounting systems for individual accounts and accounts of unlisted companies, and the convergence of national standards with IFRS.
Keywords: Accounting classification, IFRS, IAS Regulation, consolidated and individual accounts, research
JEL Classification: M41, M44, M47, G38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
International Accounting Standards and Accounting Quality
By Mary E. Barth, Wayne R. Landsman, ...
-
Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences
By Holger Daske, Luzi Hail, ...
-
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and Cons for Investors
By Ray Ball
-
Financial Statement Effects of Adopting International Accounting Standards: the Case of Germany
By Mingyi Hung and K.r. Subramanyam
-
Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
By Chris Armstrong, Mary E. Barth, ...
-
Market Reaction to the Adoption of IFRS in Europe
By Chris Armstrong, Mary E. Barth, ...
-
By Vicentiu Covrig, Mark L. Defond, ...
-
By Vicentiu M. Covrig and Mark L. Defond
-
Adopting a Label: Heterogeneity in the Economic Consequences Around IAS/IFRS Adoptions
By Holger Daske, Luzi Hail, ...
