Classification Error in Dynamic Discrete Choice Models: Implications for Female Labor Supply Behavior
43 Pages Posted: 19 Sep 2006
Date Written: September 2006
Abstract
Two key issues in the literature on female labor supply are: (1) if persistence in employment status is due to unobserved heterogeneity or state dependence, and (2) if fertility is exogenous to labor supply. Until recently, the consensus was that unobserved heterogeneity is very important, and fertility is endogenous. But Hyslop (1999) challenged this. Using a dynamic panel probit model of female labor supply including heterogeneity and state dependence, he found that adding autoregressive errors led to a substantial diminution in the importance of heterogeneity. This, in turn, meant he could not reject that fertility is exogenous. Here, we extend Hyslop (1999) to allow classification error in employment status, using an estimation procedure developed by Keane and Wolpin (2001) and Keane and Sauer (2005). We find that a fairly small amount of classification error is enough to overturn Hyslop's conclusions, leading to overwhelming rejection of the hypothesis of exogenous fertility.
Keywords: Female Labor Supply, Fertility, Discrete Choice, Classification Error, Simulated Maximum Likelihood
JEL Classification: J2, J6, C3, D1
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Parental Transfers and Borrowing Constraints On Educational Attainment
-
A New Use of Importance Sampling to Reduce Computational Burden in Simulation Estimation
-
By Michael P. Keane and Robert M. Sauer