Rating Banks: Risk and Uncertainty in an Opaque Industry
37 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2006
Date Written: May 2000
Abstract
The pattern of disagreement between bond raters suggests that bank and insurance firms are inherently more opaque than other firms. Moody's and Standard and Poor's split more frequently over these financial intermediaries, and the splits are more lopsided, as theory here predicts. Uncertainty over the banks stems from their assets, loans and trading assets in particular, the risks of which are hard to observe or easy to change. Banks' high leverage, which invites agency problems, compounds the uncertainty over their assets. Our findings bear on both the existence and reform of bank regulation.
JEL Classification: G20, G21, G28
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Market Evidence on the Opaqueness of Banking Firms' Assets
By Mark J. Flannery, Simon H. Kwan, ...
-
Bond Market Discipline of Banks: Is the Market Tough Enough?
By Donald P. Morgan and Kevin J. Stiroh
-
How Well Do Adverse Selection Components Measure Adverse Selection?
By Bonnie F. Van Ness, Robert A. Van Ness, ...
-
On Information Asymmetry Metrics
By Jonathan Clarke and Kuldeep Shastri
-
True Spreads and Equilibrium Prices
By Tarun Chordia and Clifford A. Ball
-
Economic and Financial Determinants of Oil and Gas Exploration Activity
-
By Shawn Thomas and C. Edward Fee
-
Financial Contracting and the Choice between Private Placement and Publicly Offered Bonds
By Simon H. Kwan and Willard T. Carleton
-
Insider Trading and the Bid-Ask Spread
By Charlie Charoenwong and Kee H. Chung
-
Asset Opaqueness, Split Bond Ratings, and Rating Migration
By Miles Livingston, Andy Naranjo, ...