Weekly Standard, Vol. 10, No. 37, June 13, 2005
5 Pages Posted: 16 Oct 2006
This 2005 article from the Weekly Standard criticizes the 2005 Amnesty International report and associated press releases and press conferences referring to the Guantanamo Bay detention facility as an American gulag. It more broadly criticizes the human rights movement for wanting it both ways - on the one hand, using extraordinarily inflammatory rhetoric such as raising the spectre of Soviet death camps, while on the other hand, calling for that very same, apparently deeply criminal regime, the Bush administration, to perform the tasks of human rights enforcement that the human rights movement would like to see performed elsewhere in the world, such as rescuing Darfur from genocide. The article argues that a human rights movement arguing such inconsistent propositions - you are a great criminal, but please come rescue us - increasingly, and sadly, fails the test of moral seriousness.
Keywords: Guantanamo, detainees, interrogation, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Darfur, human rights, gulag, American gulag, torture
JEL Classification: K10, K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Anderson, Kenneth, An American Gulag? Human Rights Groups Test the Limits of Moral Equivalency. Weekly Standard, Vol. 10, No. 37, June 13, 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=935770