A Feeling of Unease About Privacy Law

11 Pages Posted: 18 Oct 2006

See all articles by Ann Bartow

Ann Bartow

Franklin Pierce Center for IP at UNH Law


This essay responds to Daniel Solove's recent article, A Taxonomy of Privacy. I have read many of Daniel Solove's privacy-related writings, and he has made many important scholarly contributions to the field. As with his previous works about privacy and the law, it is an interesting and substantive piece of work. Where it falls short, in my estimation, is in failing to label and categorize the very real harms of privacy invasions in an adequately compelling manner. Most commentators agree that compromising a person's privacy will chill certain behaviors and change others, but a powerful list of the reasons why this is a negative phenomenon that the law should seek to prevent is not a significant attribute of Solove's taxonomy. That omission left this reader a little concerned about the ultimate usefulness of the privacy framework that Solove has developed. To phrase it colloquially, in this author's view, the Solove taxonomy of privacy suffers from too much doctrine, and not enough dead bodies. It frames privacy harms in dry, analytical terms that fail to sufficiently identify and animate the compelling ways that privacy violations can negatively impact the lives of living, breathing human beings beyond simply provoking feelings of unease.

Keywords: privacy law taxonomy

JEL Classification: K0, K11, K14, K19, K40

Suggested Citation

Bartow, Ann, A Feeling of Unease About Privacy Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 154, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=938482

Ann Bartow (Contact Author)

Franklin Pierce Center for IP at UNH Law ( email )

Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics