Naming Auditor Defendants in Securities Class Actions

Posted: 31 May 1998

See all articles by Ross D. Fuerman

Ross D. Fuerman

Suffolk University - Department of Accounting

Abstract

In recent years, the risk to auditors of being named defendants in private securities class actions has been of concern, not only to auditors, but also to those concerned with facilitating capital formation. Nonetheless, there has been no empirically tested model that credibly demonstrates the factors associated with naming auditors defendants in private securities class actions. A theory based on Kinney (1993) framework is developed to differentiate between securities class actions with auditor defendants versus securities class actions without auditor defendants. The theory is empirically tested. Asymptotic and, where necessary, exact logistic regression are used. In 86 of 476 securities lawsuits commenced from April 1992 to April 1995, an auditor was named a defendant. Five independent variables are positively associated with naming the auditor a defendant: the issuance of an Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release where the auditor and management are charged with wrongdoing; the issuance of an Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release where management, but not the auditor, are charged with wrongdoing; auditee bankruptcy; plaintiff class period length; and a restatement of previously issued audited annual financial statements.

JEL Classification: G38, K22, K41

Suggested Citation

Fuerman, Ross D., Naming Auditor Defendants in Securities Class Actions. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=93868

Ross D. Fuerman (Contact Author)

Suffolk University - Department of Accounting ( email )

Sawyer Business School
Department of Accounting
Boston, MA 02108
United States
617-573-8615 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.suffolk.edu/business/faculty/12328.php

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
786
PlumX Metrics