Punitive Damages for Breach of Contract: What's so Special About Contract Claims?

15 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2006

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

The thrust of this paper can be straightforwardly summarized in two propositions.

(1)If we accept the principle of punitive damages in tort cases, their appropriateness in at least some suits for breach of contract cannot seriously be questioned. The issue is not so much whether punitive awards should be available for breach of contract, but when.

(2)Subject to one possible exception, there is no need for specific restrictions on their availability in breach of contract cases. It is true that there may be a commercial necessity to prevent every breach of contract suit from becoming a potential punitive damages claim: but this, I suggest, can be perfectly well satisfied by applying principles similar to those that already govern damages in torts.

Suggested Citation

Tettenborn, Andrew M., Punitive Damages for Breach of Contract: What's so Special About Contract Claims? (2005). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=938700 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.938700

Andrew M. Tettenborn (Contact Author)

Law School, Swansea University ( email )

Richard Price Building
Singleton Park
Swansea, SA2 8PP
United Kingdom
01792-602724 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
563
rank
46,730
Abstract Views
3,433
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information