On the Accuracy of Different Measures of Q
30 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2006
Abstract
Tobin's q is widely accepted as a proxy for an underlying "true" q, which is assumed to characterize a firm's incentive to invest. Researchers have developed numerous methods for computing q. This article assesses the measurement quality of different proxies for q. We adapt the measurement-error consistent estimators in Erickson and Whited (2002) to estimate the extent to which variation in true unobservable q explains variation in different proxies for q. We find most proxies for q are poor: careful algorithms for calculating q do little to improve measurement quality. Using elaborate algorithms, however, depletes the number of usable observations and possibly introduces sample selection bias.
JEL Classification: G31, C13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
By Steven M. Fazzari, Bruce C. Petersen, ...
-
Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and Q
By Timothy Erickson and Toni M. Whited
-
Inflation, Taxation, and Corporate Investment: A Q-Theory Approach
-
The Stock Market, Profit and Investment
By Olivier J. Blanchard, Changyong Rhee, ...
-
Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are Not Valid Measures of Financing Constraints
By Steven N. Kaplan and Luigi Zingales
-
The Present Value of Profits and Cyclical Movements in Investment