28 Pages Posted: 22 Oct 2006 Last revised: 24 Nov 2014
Date Written: December 25, 2006
We study the nature of judicial bias in bankruptcy proceedings following the enactment of the 1998 bankruptcy law in Russia. The two main findings are as follows. First, regional political characteristics affected judicial decisions about the numbers and types of bankruptcy proceedings initiated after the law took effect. Controlling for indicators of firms' insolvency and the quality of the regional judiciary, re-organization procedures were significantly more frequent in regions with politically popular governors and governors who had hostile relations with the federal center. Poor judicial quality was also associated with higher incidence of re-organizations. Second, the quality of the regional judiciary affected performance of firms under the re-organization procedure: in regions with low quality judges, firms that were re-organized according to the 1998 law had significantly lower growth in sales, labor productivity, and product variety compared to firms not subject to bankruptcy proceedings. In contrast, in regions with high quality judges, firms in re-organization outperformed firms not in bankruptcy proceedings. This effect of judicial quality on the performance of re-organized firms was stronger when governors were politically popular. These findings are consistent with the view that politically strong governors subverted enforcement of the 1998 bankruptcy law.
Keywords: bankruptcy, capture, incentives, regional governments, Russia, transition
JEL Classification: D23, G33, H11, H77
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Mogiliansky, Adriane Lambert and Sonin, Konstantin and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina, Are Russian Commercial Courts Biased? Evidence from a Bankruptcy Law Transplant (December 25, 2006). Journal of Comparative Economics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=939032 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.939032