11 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2006
Date Written: October 31, 2006
If a tortious act (e.g., negligently firing a rifle) occurs in state X and the harm (e.g., killing a bystander) occurs in state Y, which state's law should apply? This is a simple example of the "choice of law" problem in torts. The problem arises between states or provinces with different laws within one nation and between different nations. In this comment, prepared for the 2006 American Association of Law Schools Annual Meeting, I examine this problem largely in terms of incentive effects, and briefly consider how the analysis could be incorporated into the standard introductory course on tort law. I conclude that a zone of foreseeable impact rule provides the best underlying principle in conflict of law situations. This rule supports the traditional legal approach (lex loci) to conflicts of laws and helps to explain modern approaches as well.
Keywords: tort, choice of law, zone of foreseeable impact, conflict of law, law of forum, law of injury site, law of decision site, balancing tests
JEL Classification: K13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Hylton, Keith N., Torts and Choice of Law: Searching for Principles (October 31, 2006). Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 06-41. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=941671 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.941671