The Performance of the European Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from the 5th Takeover Wave
Europen Financial Management Journal, Forthcoming
ECGI - Finance Working Paper No. 135/2006
CentER Discussion Paper No. 2006-118
44 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2006 Last revised: 10 Jan 2009
Date Written: July 10, 2008
Abstract
This paper shows an in-depth analysis of the performance of large, medium-sized, and small corporate takeovers involving Continental European and UK firms during the fifth takeover wave. We find that takeovers are expected to create takeover synergies as their announcements trigger statistical significant abnormal returns of 9.13% for the targets and of 0.53% for bidding firms. The characteristics of the targets and bidding firms and of the bid itself are able to explain a significant part of these returns: (i) deal hostility increases the targets' but decreases bidders' returns; (ii) the private status of the target is associated with higher bidder returns; and (iii) an equity payment leads to a decrease in both bidders' and targets' returns. The takeover wealth effect is not limited to the announcement day but is visible prior and subsequent to the bid. In particular, hostile takeovers trigger larger abnormal returns at announcement but this value is incorporated to some extent in the bidder's and target's share price already prior to the bid announcement. In addition, a bidder benefits from accumulating a toehold stake in the target and these benefits are reflected in bidder's returns subsequent to the takeover announcement. A comparison of the UK and Continental European M&A markets reveals that: (i) The abnormal returns of UK targets substantially exceed those of Continental European firm. (ii) The presence of a large shareholder in the bidding firm has a significantly positive effect on the takeover returns in the UK and a negative one in Continental Europe. (iii) Weak investor protection and low disclosure in Continental Europe allow bidding firms to adopt takeover strategies enabling them to act opportunistically towards the targets' incumbent shareholders.
Keywords: takeovers, mergers and acquisitions, diversification, hostile takeovers, means of payment, cross-border acquisitions, private target, partial acquisitions, blockholder, toehold, investor protection, UK, Continental Europe
JEL Classification: G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers
By Gregor Andrade, Mark L. Mitchell, ...
-
Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions?
By Randall Morck, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrent and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures
By Robert Comment and G. William Schwert
-
Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers?
By Paul M. Healy, Krishna Palepu, ...
-
Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q, and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers
By Larry H.p. Lang, Ralph A. Walkling, ...