Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea and Sentence Bargaining

32 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2006

See all articles by Susan R. Klein

Susan R. Klein

University of Texas School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper


This article examines what can be done to further accuracy of adjudication and equality among defendants, especially at the plea and sentencing stages, in a federal criminal justice system that has moved from an adjudicative to a de facto administrative regime. It highlights how the coercive power of plea bargaining, unequal treatment of criminal defendants based upon wealth, race, and geography, ubiquity of appeal waivers, and the dearth of constitutional or other regulation in this area have contributed to these inequalities. Finally, it suggests some improvements in plea, discovery, and sentencing procedures that may be possible in a post-Booker world.

Suggested Citation

Klein, Susan R., Enhancing the Judicial Role in Criminal Plea and Sentence Bargaining. Texas Law Review, Vol. 84, p. 2023, 2006; U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 110. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=941810

Susan R. Klein (Contact Author)

University of Texas School of Law ( email )

727 East Dean Keeton Street
Austin, TX 78705
United States
512-232-1324 (Phone)
512-471-6988 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.utexas.edu/law/faculty/sklein/

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics