Epistemology & the Law of Evidence: Four Doubts About Alex Stein's Foundations of Evidence Law

31 Pages Posted: 7 Nov 2006

See all articles by Amit Pundik

Amit Pundik

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law

Date Written: January 8, 2006

Abstract

In Foundations of Evidence Law, Alex Stein provides an innovative understanding of the law of evidence. He divides evidence law into two distinct domains, moral and epistemological, and specifies principles which govern each. According to Stein, the primary domain is epistemological and morality picks up what the epistemology leaves off. In this paper, I dispute the role Stein gives to epistemology. I raise four doubts to undermine Stein's epistemological apparatus and challenge its usability, sustainability and justifiability. I also argue that whilst epistemology can give a broader understanding of the issues involved, it cannot provide principles or justifications for the law of evidence. The difficulties in Stein's theory result not only from the particular epistemological apparatus he develops, but also from his attempt to establish evidential principles that are epistemological in nature.

Keywords: Evidence, Epistemology, Stein, Moral

Suggested Citation

Pundik, Amit, Epistemology & the Law of Evidence: Four Doubts About Alex Stein's Foundations of Evidence Law (January 8, 2006). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=942635 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.942635

Amit Pundik (Contact Author)

Tel Aviv University - Buchmann Faculty of Law ( email )

Ramat Aviv
Tel Aviv 69978, IL
Israel

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
263
Abstract Views
1,135
rank
114,548
PlumX Metrics