A New Method of Random Sampling to Reduce the Cost of Regulatory Monitoring

26 Pages Posted: 9 Nov 2006

See all articles by Robert J. Jackson, Jr.

Robert J. Jackson, Jr.

New York University School of Law

David Rosenberg

Harvard Law School

Date Written: November 2006

Abstract

This Article proposes a new method of reducing the costs administrative agencies incur in monitoring regulatory compliance by a firm that operates multiple sources of risk, such as air-polluting smokestacks. The expense of individually monitoring such sources directly may consume a large share of the agency's enforcement budget. Under our proposal, regulators would instead randomly select one of the firm's sources of risk, determine the firm's liability at that source, and apply that outcome perforce as determinative of liability at all of the sources. The proposal significantly reduces monitoring costs because agencies need to monitor only one source of risk to replicate the deterrence generated by the source-by-source approach that regulators currently use. To indicate the potential benefits, we apply the proposal to EPA monitoring of compliance with regulations limiting pollution under the Clean Air Act. We also address potential risk-bearing and judgment-proof costs associated with the use of our proposal and explain how both problems can be solved.

JEL Classification: A1, A10, K00, K10, K13, K23, K32, K41

Suggested Citation

Jackson, Jr., Robert J. and Rosenberg, Michael, A New Method of Random Sampling to Reduce the Cost of Regulatory Monitoring (November 2006). Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 562, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=943038 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.943038

Robert J. Jackson, Jr.

New York University School of Law ( email )

40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States

Michael Rosenberg (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-4558 (Phone)
617-495-1110 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
224
Abstract Views
2,149
Rank
234,745
PlumX Metrics