Posted: 11 Nov 2006
In this paper, we reply to criticisms raised by Prof. John Rogers, Lewis Kornhauser, Lawrence Sager, and Maxwell Stearns in connection with the proposal we advanced in an earlier publication (see 80 Geo. L.J. 743 (1992)) regarding the proper method of cumulating votes of individual members of multi-judge panels.
Keywords: judicial voting, multi-member courts, Condorcet Paradox
JEL Classification: K41, K10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Post, David G. and Salop, Steven C., Issues and Outcomes, Guidance and Indeterminacy: A reply to Professor John Rogers and Others. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 49, 1996. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=943515