Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Issues and Outcomes, Guidance and Indeterminacy: A reply to Professor John Rogers and Others

Posted: 11 Nov 2006  

David G. Post

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Steven C. Salop

Georgetown University Law Center

Abstract

In this paper, we reply to criticisms raised by Prof. John Rogers, Lewis Kornhauser, Lawrence Sager, and Maxwell Stearns in connection with the proposal we advanced in an earlier publication (see 80 Geo. L.J. 743 (1992)) regarding the proper method of cumulating votes of individual members of multi-judge panels.

Keywords: judicial voting, multi-member courts, Condorcet Paradox

JEL Classification: K41, K10

Suggested Citation

Post, David G. and Salop, Steven C., Issues and Outcomes, Guidance and Indeterminacy: A reply to Professor John Rogers and Others. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 49, 1996. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=943515

David G. Post (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Steven C. Salop

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9095 (Phone)
202-662-9497 (Fax)

Paper statistics

Downloads
19
Abstract Views
247