Abuse or Protection?
8 Pages Posted: 15 Nov 2006
Abstract
Bankruptcy policy balances conflicting objectives of providing consumption insurance to debtors and protecting creditors. The adoption of the 2005 Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act shifted the balance toward creditors by raising debtors' cost of filing for bankruptcy and reducing the amount of debt that is discharged in bankruptcy. The changes will have little effect on "opportunistic" debtors, who can still use pre-bankruptcy planning shelter substantial assets in bankruptcy. But the changes are likely to harm many non-opportunistic debtors - the people whom bankruptcy law is intended to help - simply because they cannot afford the high cost of filing. A better policy approach would be to require debtors to use of portion of both their wealth and future income to make payments on their debt, which would protect non-opportunistic debtors while deterring opportunism.
Keywords: bankruptcy law, BAPCPA, debtor, creditor, consumption insurance, credit availability, bankruptcy, opportunistic debtors, non-opportunists
JEL Classification: D78, H26, H29, I30, K39, K41, L51
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Personal Bankruptcy and the Level of Entrepreneurial Activity
By Wei Fan and Michelle J. White
-
Personal Bankruptcy and the Level of Entrepreneurial Activity
By Wei Fan and Michelle J. White
-
Determinants of the Consumer Bankruptcy Decision
By Ian Domowitz and Robert Sartain
-
Bankruptcy Exemptions and the Market for Mortgage Loans
By Richard M. Hynes and Jeremy Berkowitz
-
Bankruptcy and the Market for Mortgage and Home Improvement Loans
By Emily Y. Lin and Michelle J. White
-
An Optimal Personal Bankruptcy Procedure and Proposed Reforms
By Hung-jen Wang and Michelle J. White
-
Bankruptcy Law and Entrepreneurship
By John Armour and Douglas J. Cumming
