German Inbound Investment, Corporate Tax Planning, and Thin Capitalization Rules - a Difference-in-Differences Approach
29 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2006 Last revised: 26 Aug 2008
Date Written: 2006
Abstract
This paper investigates tax planning behavior by means of inter-company finance and the effectiveness of fighting back via thin-capitalization rules. A simple theoretical model, which considers the financing decision of a multinational company, is used to obtain empirical implications. The empirical analysis, based on German inbound investment data from 1996 until 2004, supports a significant impact of tax rate differences on the use of intra-company debt. The effectiveness of the German thin-capitalization rule is tested by using legal amendments as natural experiments. The results suggest that the German thin-capitalization rule induces significantly lower intra-firm debt-levels of inbound investments. Hence, tax planning via intra-firm finance is effectively limited.
Keywords: Corporate Income Tax, Multinationals, Thin-Capitalization Rule, Difference-in-Differences, Firm-Level Data
JEL Classification: G32, H25, H26
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business
By James R. Hines Jr. and Eric M. Rice
-
Altered States: Taxes and the Location of Foreign Direct Investment in America
-
Tax Policy and Foreign Direct Investment in the United States
-
Coming Home to America: Dividend Repatriations by U.S. Multinationals
-
Taxation and Foreign Direct Investment: A Synthesis of Empirical Research
By Ruud A. De Mooij and Sjef Ederveen
-
Income Shifting in U.S. Multinational Corporations
By David Harris, Randall Morck, ...