Evidence on differences between Recognition and Disclosure: A Comparison of Inputs to Estimate Fair Values of Employee Stock Options

48 Pages Posted: 7 Dec 2006 Last revised: 22 Feb 2012

See all articles by Preeti Choudhary

Preeti Choudhary

University of Arizona, Eller College of Management

Date Written: July 20, 2010

Abstract

I investigate reliability differences across recognition and disclosure regimes to shed light on differing incentives and reporting of employee stock option (ESO) fair values. I compare ESO fair values based on firm-reported inputs with ESO fair values based on benchmark inputs, estimated following authoritative guidance. On average, I find opportunism increases with recognition as compared with disclosure, and that it is associated with incentives to manage earnings. Despite the increase in opportunism, I find that accuracy does not decline for recognizers, and that accuracy differs across voluntary and mandatory recognition.

Keywords: reliability, input assumptions, FAS 123, FAS 123-R, recognition, disclosure

JEL Classification: J33, M41, M44, M45

Suggested Citation

Choudhary, Preeti, Evidence on differences between Recognition and Disclosure: A Comparison of Inputs to Estimate Fair Values of Employee Stock Options (July 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=945398 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.945398

Preeti Choudhary (Contact Author)

University of Arizona, Eller College of Management ( email )

School of Accountancy
Tucson, AZ 85721
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
431
Abstract Views
3,719
Rank
125,137
PlumX Metrics